Naoma vs Sable: A Demo Agent You Can Try Today vs an Enterprise AI Employee

Quick Takeaways

• Naoma and Sable both put a conversational AI agent in front of your buyers, but Sable sells a waitlist-gated enterprise "AI employee" with no published pricing, while Naoma publishes tiers from $299 per month and runs a live agent you can talk to on its website today.
• Sable's agent, Aidan, runs customer calls using real-time browser use and vision inside LiveBox, a virtual machine hosting a functional copy of your product; it is in production at Notion and Decagon as of August 2026.
• Sable raised $45M co-led by Sequoia Capital and 8VC in July 2026 and displays SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 42001, yet has no pricing page and no reviews on G2, Capterra, or Product Hunt.
• Naoma bills per engaged demo: a demo is chargeable only after 3 minutes of engagement, bounces are free, and all 33 auto-detected languages come with every plan.
• The proof a buyer can check today sits on Naoma's side: in the AiSDR deployment, 53% of demos ran 3+ minutes and 21% produced a qualified lead, and Naoma holds a 4.9 on G2 and a 5.0 on Product Hunt.

Two companies promise to take the first customer call off your team's hands, and they could hardly be positioned more differently. Sable, a San Francisco startup founded in October 2025, sells Aidan, an enterprise "AI employee" already in production at Notion and Decagon, which you nonetheless cannot buy, price, or trial without getting through a contact form and a reported 150+ company waitlist. Naoma sells a full-cycle AI account executive for inbound with published pricing, public reviews, and a live agent answering questions on its website right now.

Both companies are young, and honesty cuts both ways here: Sable is under a year old with no general availability, and Naoma's own SOC 2 is still in progress (it is GDPR compliant today). This comparison walks through what each product actually does, how the two commercial models differ, and, most importantly, which claims you can verify before you sign anything. Market facts are anchored as of August 2026.

Quick comparison

What Sable does

Sable describes Aidan as "the first AI employee powered by real-time browser use and vision," built to run customer calls at scale. The framing matters: this is not a demo widget. Sable's listed use cases run from product demos and qualification through onboarding, feature launches, partner certification, user training, new-hire training, and international expansion; one agent intended to carry many kinds of customer conversation.

Under the hood, Aidan operates inside LiveBox, which Sable's investors describe as a virtual machine enabling shared, real-time interaction, where the agent "can click into any corner of the product" while the customer watches and participates. Speech is full-duplex, so Aidan talks and listens at the same time and can be interrupted mid-sentence. The agent's knowledge is assembled high-touch from seller recordings, expert interviews, and marketing materials, and Sable says it speaks dozens of languages; Fortune reports that Sequoia's Shaun Maguire invested after watching Aidan switch from English to Mandarin to Spanish mid-demo.

The traction is genuine. Notion uses Aidan for setup sessions, demos, and partner enablement, Decagon runs it in production, and Sable cites additional unnamed large public companies. The $45M round announced in July 2026, co-led by Sequoia Capital and 8VC, made Sable the best-funded startup in this field, and its compliance page is impressive: SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, and the still-rare ISO 42001 for AI management. What Sable does not have, as of August 2026, is a pricing page, a public launch, a free trial, a review on any platform, or even an official product video to watch. Evaluation starts with a form.

What Naoma does

Naoma is a full-cycle AI account executive for inbound. A visitor clicks one button and lands in a live conversation: the Naoma AI demo agent runs discovery first, then adapts the demo to what it heard, mixing slides, your real product driven live in a browser session, and branching journeys on higher plans. It handles objections, qualifies the prospect, then books the meeting or routes the buyer straight to signup and checkout, writing everything back to your CRM. It speaks 33 languages, auto-detected and switchable mid-demo, and every plan includes the high-converting website widget with a built-in chat bot.

Where evaluating Sable starts with a form, evaluating Naoma starts with the product itself.

You do not need a waitlist to see Naoma work. Talk to our agent right now, this is the actual product:

Product depth: a VM copy of your product vs your product, live

Both agents genuinely converse and genuinely operate software, which already separates them from scripted tour builders. The differences show up in where the demo runs and what the agent knows.

Where the demo runs. Aidan works inside LiveBox, a virtual machine running a functional copy of your product. That gives Sable a controlled, shareable environment, and it means the buyer watches the agent drive a replica rather than your live application. Naoma drives your real product in a live browser session, so the prospect sees the product exactly as it behaves in production, with slides woven in when the conversation calls for them.

Avatars. Sable lists browser navigation, vision, voice, and video among Aidan's capabilities, but avatar options are not documented. Naoma ships best-in-class realistic avatars, branded mascots, and animated avatars — its signature agent among them — and will build custom avatars for customers who want the agent fully on-brand.

Memory. Sable's "context graph" is org-level learning that updates after every interaction; per-prospect, cross-session memory is not claimed. Naoma launched prospect memory plus account enrichment in August 2026, so the agent knows who it is talking to and recognizes returning prospects.

Conversation feel. Interruption handling is a stated strength on both sides. Naoma runs an in-house stack with roughly 20% faster conversational reaction than an ElevenLabs stack, and 77% of surveyed end users specifically praise how it handles interruptions.

The build. Both vendors construct the agent for you: Sable trains Aidan on your recordings and experts, while Naoma builds your demo at onboarding, with the Scale plan adding a dedicated demo engineer for the initial build and revisions.

Pricing: a published number vs an enterprise conversation

This is the widest gap between the two products, and it is structural rather than cosmetic.

Sable publishes no pricing: no page, no tiers, no billing metric. No third-party contract data has surfaced either, so there is not even a "reported" figure to plan around. With no free trial and no self-serve purchase, the only path is a contact form followed by an enterprise sales motion, with availability still gated behind a waitlist as of August 2026.

Naoma publishes every tier on its pricing page: Starter at $299/mo for 50 engaged demos, Growth at $900/mo for 100 engaged demos with live product walkthroughs, Scale at $2,500/mo with branching journeys, deep personalization, and a dedicated demo engineer, plus a custom Enterprise tier with SSO and an SLA. Annual billing drops those to $249, $750, and $2,083. That makes Naoma the lowest published entry price in the demo-first segment.

The model matters as much as the number. A Naoma demo becomes chargeable only after 3 minutes of real engagement; bounces are free. Most of the market bills on delivery, whether through seats, sessions, traffic, or conversations, engaged or not. To see what engagement-based billing means for your own funnel, run your numbers through the ROI calculator.

One honesty note: Naoma's self-serve purchase and free trial launch in September 2026, so today every plan starts with a quote request or a booked walkthrough. The difference is that you walk into that conversation already knowing the price.

Proof: what can a buyer verify before signing?

Sable's evidence is press and named deployments. Notion and Decagon are serious references, the Sequoia and 8VC round is public record, and the certifications are displayed on its site. But there are no reviews anywhere, no G2, Capterra, or Product Hunt presence as of August 2026, no published customer metrics, and no way to experience the product before entering a sales process. You are trusting the references you are handed.

Naoma's evidence is checkable from your desk. The agent has conducted more than 50,000 AI demos, and in the published AiSDR case study, 53% of demos ran 3 minutes or longer, the average conversation lasted 7 minutes 50 seconds, a quarter of sessions passed the 10-minute mark, 21% of demos produced a qualified lead, and 6% ended with a meeting booked. On the review side, Naoma holds a 4.9 on G2 and a 5.0 on Product Hunt, where it was #1 Product of the Day and #1 Product of the Month in Marketing. Site-published usage data adds that 89% of end users mention the best-in-class human feel and under 2% of sessions hit any technical issue.

Neither company is a decade-old incumbent. But one lets you verify its claims today, and the other asks you to wait.

Where Sable fits, and where Naoma wins

Choose Sable if you are a large enterprise that wants one AI employee across the whole customer lifecycle, from demos through onboarding, partner certification, and internal training, and your procurement team is comfortable with a waitlist, a custom deal, and no public reviews to lean on. Its compliance posture is a genuine advantage: Sable displays SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 42001, while Naoma is GDPR compliant with SOC 2 still in progress. If your security team requires the certificate on day one, that is a real point for Sable, and we will not pretend otherwise.

Choose Naoma if you want a demo-first agent you can evaluate, price, and deploy on normal timelines: published tiers from $299/mo, billing tied to engagement, 33 languages on every plan, avatars and prospect memory included, and results you can audit through public reviews and published case rates.

For adjacent matchups, see how Sable compares with the other heavily funded entrant in Sable vs Supersonik, read Naoma vs Supersonik, or browse every matchup on the comparisons hub.

FAQ

Can I buy or try Sable today? No. As of August 2026 Sable has no public launch, no free trial, and no self-serve purchase; access runs through a contact form, and the company cites a 150+ company waitlist. Naoma's live agent is available on its website today, with self-serve and a free trial launching September 2026.

Does Sable publish pricing? No. There is no pricing page, no tiers, and no reported contract data as of August 2026. Naoma publishes all tiers from $299/mo on its pricing page.

Does Sable's agent drive my real product? Aidan operates inside LiveBox, a virtual machine running a functional copy of your product that the buyer can watch and interact with in real time. Naoma drives your actual product live in a browser session.

Is Sable more enterprise-ready than Naoma? On certifications, yes: Sable displays SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, and ISO 42001, while Naoma is GDPR compliant with SOC 2 in progress. On verifiable buying signals like published pricing, public reviews, and case metrics, Naoma is far ahead.

How proven is Naoma? In the AiSDR case, 53% of demos ran 3+ minutes, 21% produced a qualified lead, and 6% ended with a booked meeting, and Naoma holds a 4.9 on G2 and a 5.0 on Product Hunt.

Ready to judge the difference in the next five minutes? Get an AI demo now →